Sustainable materials in consumer electrical and electronic products – how to design for recycled and recycling to extend the life of materials.

The amount of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) produced each year is around 50 million tonnes (2020) and growing rapidly around the world. The design and manufacture of things like mobile phones, televisions, kitchen equipment, toys and computers — intended to make them as desirable and affordable as possible — means they tend to be very difficult to recycle end of life. But the end of a product’s life should not be the end for the materials; instead it is the start of a new chapter.

Electrical and electronic products are made up of a complex mix of plastics, elastomers and metals, electronics, batteries and screens; all of which contain valuable resources that can be recycled and reused if the constituent parts can be separated and identified. Today, the main economic driver for WEEE recycling is based on recovering precious metals such as gold, silver, palladium and copper. By designing products from recycled material, and designing them for recycling end of life, increases the likelihood of circularity.

Product categories for recycling

The effectiveness of design for recycling depends on context and how products are sorted and processed end of life. While in packaging these divisions are well-defined and understandable for everyone — plastic bottles, card boxes, tin cans and so on — consumer electronics can be more difficult. The categories include temperature exchange equipment (cookers, fridges etc), screens, large equipment (white goods for example), lamps, small equipment, and small IT equipment. Each of these is treated differently in recycling centres, because the material make up varies. For example, a fridge contains liquids and insulation, whereas small equipment is mostly metal components and electronics; and whereas a cooker might be 90% metal, a TV may contain 50% glass and only 5% metal.

As a result, large items are often disassembled, and this helps to separate the individual materials. By contrast, small items are simply shredded to extract the valuable metals. There are several companies making recycled material from white goods, such a high impact polystyrene (HIPS) fridge liners. Smile Plastics in the UK produce a range of recycled sheet materials suitable for furniture, retail and interior projects. Likewise, Plasticiet in the Netherlands produce bright and colourful sheets from post consumer recycled fridge liners and industrial waste. The Good Plastic Company, also in the Netherlands, produce a recycled polystyrene (rPS) sheet called Polygood. The produce a range of bright and speckled colours, including bespoke blends to suit different projects.

Small equipment may be crushed to allow for pre-sorting by hand, such as removing batteries and valuable items like PCBs and electric motors. As a result, the housing is often shredded and mixed with other waste and residue, from which it can be difficult to separate. While ferrous (like steel) and non-ferrous metals (like aluminium and copper) are relatively straightforward to extract from mixed waste, plastics can be much more challenging due to the huge range of types and additives in use. Another important consideration is how different materials are joined. For example, if plastic is permanently joined to metal, then it is likely to be ‘sacrificed’ (burnt off) during the process of recycling the metal. Dissimilar metals can be more problematic, because one may contaminate the other during processing. For example, mixing cast and wrought aluminium, whose chemistry is optimised to suit the very different types of forming process, can lead to down-cycling of the recycled material. Dissimilar plastics permanently joined together—by welding, stacking or adhesive bonding—cannot be recycled. Instead, they will be incinerated for energy recovery or landfilled.

Therefore, design for recycling as a process can follow two routes. Either the individual materials are put together in such a way that they are straightforward to separate (such as with screws or snap fits), or the materials are assembled in such a way that they do not require disassembly prior to recycling. The latter route requires a deeper understanding of the recycling processes and may only be feasible in a closed loop system. To give an example from the packaging industry, milk cartons in the UK which are blow moulded polyethylene (PE), have coloured lids to identify the fat content: full, semi or skimmed. The amount of pigment used in the lid has been set low enough that when recycled together with the plastic bottles, it becomes so diluted that it does not visibly affect the colour.

Steel

Worldwide around 1.85 bn tonnes of steel is produced annually, with around 35% of raw materials coming from recycled scrap. In theory, all new steel could be made from scrap, but there is not enough and the longevity of products made from steel means material going into products today may not be recycled for years or even decades. The majority of iron ore, the raw material for steel production, comes from Australia, Brazil, China, India and Russia. In blast furnace basic oxygen steelmaking (BOF) process up to around 30% scrap steel is added as a cooling agent, absorbing excess heat from the exothermic decarbonisation process and thus helping to reduce the overall carbon footprint. In electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking, up to 100% scrap is used to make new steel products.

End of life steel recycling rates are around 85%. It is relatively economic and straightforward to separate from mixed waste because it is magnetic. During the steelmaking process most impurities present in scrap can be removed (burnt off). However there are some elements, like copper, which degrade the quality of steel and so are removed where possible during sorting. During the design process it is possible to specify a high proportion of recycled steel, because the properties are like new and highly predictable. Components should make the most of steel’s relatively high strength and stiffness. Automotive and construction are two industries that have learnt to make the most of novel high strength steels to reduce weight, and thus minimise the consumption of resources.

Aluminium

Annual production is in the region of 56 million tonnes, 18 of which comes from recycled scrap (32%). It is widely cited that recycled aluminium uses as little as 5% of the energy and emits only 5% of the greenhouse gas as virgin. This over-simplification smooths over the fact that virgin aluminium is incredibly energy intensive to produce. As an example, more than 10 times the energy is required to produce 1 kg aluminium versus 1 kg carbon steel. At 1.1 giga-tonnes CO2 emissions, the aluminium industry is responsible for around 1% of total manmade greenhouse gas emissions. Considering around 40% of the impact of aluminium is from the production process, but 60% from electricity power generation, the source of energy can be more important, in terms of carbon footprint (greenhouse gas emissions), than the raw materials and proportion of recycled content.

Aluminium recycling efficiency is around 75% worldwide, boosted by the very high rate of aluminium can recycling – within around 60 days, an aluminium drinks can goes through a full cycle of production, use and recycling, ready to be consumed allover again. Aluminium is extracted from mixed waste using an eddy current separator. Once the ferrous metals have been extracted using magnets, repelling forces are created by permanent rare earth magnets. Eddy currents are introduced into non-ferrous metallic particles, and the alternating magnetic fields help to separate them from non-metallics like plastic and glass fragments.

Plastic

According to Plastics Europe (A circular Economy for Plastics, 2022), the total amount of recycled plastic used in new products averages 8.5%, with electrical and electronic products using 2.9% on average. It is significantly less than the amount of metal being recycled. This is a direct result of how the plastics industry has evolved and the way these materials behave in recycling and disposal. Additionally, there are concerns about the safety of some plastic recycling. Mechanically grinding plastic into small pieces suitable for separation and recycling generates large quantities of microplastics, which often end up contaminating wastewater. There is also a risk that plastics contain substances of concern (SoC), as well as substances of very high concern (SoVHC). For example, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is used as an anti-dripping agent in plastic used in electronics such as headphones, earbuds and speakers. It helps to achieve the required level of flame retardancy. PTFE uses polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in its production. These hazardous ingredients do not degrade or break down, known as ‘forever chemicals’, they are shown to be extremely persistent in both the environment and in the human body. They are toxic and known to be carcinogenic.

Unlike steel and aluminium, the plastics used in consumer products tend to be very difficult to recycle into material of the same value, because they comprise a complex mix of technical engineering polymers and additives. The chemistry is optimised to provide very specific visual and mechanical properties like colour and transparency, toughness and impact strength, sealing, tactility and strength-to-weight. It is impossible to separate the thousands of different grades and mixes in use, and so recycled material will be a blend including various additives, pigments and enhancers. In addition to this, plastics tend to oxidise at high temperature (such as when melting and moulding). Additives are incorporated into the material to reduce the negative impacts, but they are consumed by the process. This means that with each heating cycle, the quality of the material is degraded. This is very different from metal, which can be melted and reformed many times without any loss of mechanical properties.

While packaging and disposables have a very short lifespan, some of the material in WEEE, like fridges, may have entered the market decades earlier. Over the years it has been discovered that some of the ingredients used in plastics, like flame retardant additives and plasticisers, are toxic and potentially dangerous to humans and the planet. This means they cannot be used in new products and potentially contaminate waste streams. The mix of additives can cause other problems, too, such as affecting the conductivity of the material causing it to interfere with radio waves. This means it may not be suitable for electrical devices that need to transmit or receive data wirelessly. Or at least, not covering the area directly around the antennas.

So what are the options with plastics? One approach is to standardise the type of material used to create the potential for a higher rate of recycling end of life. Using a more commonly recycled materials—such as polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyester, instead of polycarbonate (PC) or acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)—offers the chance to interact with more recyclers and so increase the likelihood of recycling and the value of the recycled material. In the same way, avoiding additives (such as glass fibre or carbon fibre), and blends like PC/ABS, increases the value of the material end of life.

There is also the option to align with existing recycling systems, such as employed in packaging. Here, recycling rates are closer to one-third. However, even with high volumes of semi-standardised materials the recycling efficiency is still very low compared to metal and glass. The problem is compounded by a process of down cycling, whereby high quality material is taken from recycled bottles into trays, textiles and films, which are recycled at much lower rates, if at all. For every 10 tons of PET bottles, 5 tons is recycled and 1.7 tons of that into new bottles. However, for every 10 tons of PET trays, such as used to package meat, <2 tons is recycled; and in the case of PET textiles, only 1 ton for every 10 tons. In the case of multi-layer films, such as used for stand-up pouches and coffee packaging, none is recycled. This is because it is impractical, if not impossible, to separate the individual materials. Read more about plastic and the circular economy.

Bioplastic

Bio-based material developments provide an alternative to conventional fossil-based plastics and in many cases offer a significantly lower environmental impact. Have a look at the other articles that dig into the detail of the innovations and developments in this space like Bioplastic — the good, the bad and the ugly and Bio-based material developments — so good you could eat them (almost). In terms of bioplastics for consumer products, there are a few options available with more on the way, depending on the exact requirements.

Bio-based versions of regular plastics have been creating, using renewable feedstocks in place of oil. While they do not offer any additional benefit end of life—many can be recycled alongside their fossil-based counterparts—the use of potentially renewable ingredients helps to minimise the initial negative impacts. Bio-based polypropylene (bio-PP) and polyethylene (bio-PE) are used as drop-in replacements for regular PP and PE, as well as other commodity plastics. While predominantly used in packaging, they can be applied in some types of consumer product housings. For example, PP is commonly used in kitchen electrical equipment, such as kettles, and both PP and PE are used to make toys and sports products. Bio-based polyurethane resin (bio-PUR) offers an alternative to fossil-based thermosetting plastics in many situations including rigid parts, elastomers, coatings and adhesives. There are many different options with bio-based content up to 70%.

While these materials offer a potentially renewable alternative to regular plastic, they are susceptible to the same challenges end of life as all other plastics. For example, low recycling rates, microplastics and pollution through careless disposal. Biodegradable polyesters, in particular bio-based types like polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), present a different type of solution. While they can be moulded like regular plastics, such as by injection moulding, they are derived from potentially renewable materials like corn, and can be composted end of life. Biodegradation is a science in itself and should be carefully considered for each individual application to check it is the right solution. This topic is explored in more details in Bioplastic — the good, the bad and the ugly.

Cellulose acetate is a family of semi-synthetic plastics, some of which are biodegradable and home compostable at the end of their useful life. Grades have been developed that are partially bio-based and suitable for used in electrical and electronic products. For example, Eastman Treva contains 45% cellulose sourced from sustainably managed forest. It boasts improved dimensional stability over existing bioplastics, as well as strong chemical resistance, including skin oils, sunscreen and cleaners, making it well suited for high-durability items that come in contact with the skin. In addition, low birefringence eliminates the rainbow effect some plastics experience with polarised light, giving the material some potential advantage in electronic device screens and retail displays. Competing with polycarbonate (PC) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), is used in packaging, eyewear and consumer product housings, for example.

Textile

Textiles provide unrivalled functionality and aesthetic appeal in certain categories of electronic product, such as stand alone speakers, speaker covers on screens, padding, covers and cases. While they do not make up a significant proportion of the materials used, by weight, their use can hinder recycling if not carefully considered. For example, permanently bonding or joining textile to other components means neither will be recycled.

There has been a great deal of innovation in textile recycling and on their own, many types of fabric can be reprocessed into new fibres without any loss of quality. However, recycling rates are very low and it is estimated that three-quarters ends up in landfill. In the recycling of WEEE, the very low volume and diversity of textiles used means they are most likely going to end up in landfill. The only way around this is to make sure the textile parts can be completely removed from the product by the end user and manually placed into the textile recycling system.

Knowing that recycling is very unlikely, it is a good idea to make sure that the input material has the least negative environmental impact. For example, renewable materials like organic cotton, hemp, flax and ethical wool are a good place to start. Alternatively, there are a few polymers available in both textile and moulded format. For example, polyamide (PA), nylon, polyester, PP and PE. The advantage of this is that they may be recycled together. These so-called monomaterial solutions may be suitable for either mechanical or chemical recycling without requiring disassembly – see Plastics and the circular economy and Textile recycling innovation. This approach may offer potential in other industries too, like fashion, sports and automotive, where a complex mix of plastic formats often means different chemistries are required and renders parts non-recyclable.